Ernst wrote: > that's [non-bronzing MIS beta inks] real progress. I didn't expect a third party answer to Epson's K3 > UCs that quick. I'm not sure progress in making a better base has much to do with the Epson K3 inks. The timing might just be a happy coincidence. The new base will probably replace the base in all UT inks. The general pigment industry is a lot larger than Epson. From what I can tell, the only unique think Epson has is the acrylic coatings on the inkjet-size pigments. This coating may have both good and bad qualities. > There's no drawback in matte printing with the new inks > + Eboni, so a universal ink set except for the blacks? Let's hope. I'll be fade testing them this month. Paul www.PaulRoark.com _________________________ > Paul Roark wrote: > > > > >Don't spend much time on Glop. It looks like bronzing is about to be > >history -- no glop needed. I have tested beta UT inks with the new base > -- > >no bronzing. I just received the beta 2400 color prints & Epson "Advance > >B&W" monotone glossy prints -- no bronzing. > > > >It's too early to know that this is going to be true for all the inksets > and > >papers, but the results I've seen so far eliminate the artifact as a > serious > >issue. > > > >Don't bother MIS about this because it'll be months before the total B&W > >switch over takes place. > > > >The color 2400 inks will show up on MIS's web site in a couple of weeks. > >(No 2400 carts yet.) > > > > > >Paul > >www.PaulRoark.com > >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Bronzing, Glop, New inks [was QTR/R1800 matte vs glossy dottiness (Question for Roy)]
2005-07-21 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.