Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Phase One Capture One Software vs. Photohop CS2's Raw Conversion Utility

2005-07-23 by Steve Kale

All 'n all CS2 is much better, especially when you use Thomas Fors'
calibration script.  I have used both but now really only use CS2 unless I
want to shoot tethered in which case I use C1 for capture only.  (I have
used the Etcetera profiles for C1 also.)  CS2 offers so much more control
and functionality (eg chromatic aberration correction).  And you get it free
along with all the other great features of CS2. Get Bruce Fraser's ACR book
(the second addition).


> From: n59027 <jeffgusky@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:34:54 -0000
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Digital BW] Phase One Capture One Software vs. Photohop CS2's Raw
> Conversion Utility
> 
> How does CS2's new raw conversion utility stack up against the current version
> of Phase 
> One's Capture One software; in particular for shooting black-and-white fine
> art work with a 
> Canon 1Ds MkII?
> 
> Thank you, Jeff

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.