--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > > > Wouldn't it have been good for all of us if that press release > > proclaimed in nice proud verbiage that they are inkjet? > > Tyler > > > Of course, but if you look at the price tag that these things will ultimately have attached to > them you can understand their nervousness. I don't think they're being "nervous." And I don't think "carbon" confuses anybody. Carbro, on the other hand, is primarily of historic interest, as opposed to imagemaking interest...if someone works with carbro today, it's up to THEM to belabor "carbro" Vs "carbon." Perhaps we/someone should define "carbon ink" more clearly, mentioning specifics that have to do with likely permanence...that might be helpful to galleries.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Bill Brandt "carbon prints" Los Angeles
2005-07-24 by Djon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.