I have not followed this thread completely, so maybe I am misunderstanding something. As the author or several articles on (traditional) Carbon printing, I must say that Carbro (using Bromide print) is simply a variation of the Carbon process(AmDichromate sensitization, contact print via actinic light). Thus, I think that using the term Carbon print for an ink jet print is misleading. J Vee On 7/24/05 12:09 AM, "Djon" <westsidemaurice@...> wrote: > > I don't think they're being "nervous." And I don't think "carbon" > confuses anybody. Carbro, on the other hand, is primarily of historic > interest, as opposed to imagemaking interest...if someone works with > carbro today, it's up to THEM to belabor "carbro" Vs "carbon." > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Bill Brandt "carbon prints" Los Angeles
2005-07-25 by J Vee
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.