Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ultratone vs. Epson K3 Inks

2005-07-31 by Eric Vogel

Walt,

I just joined this forum this weekend, and am delighted to find this 
kind of post here.

I have been thinking about a 2400 as my first serious digital printer 
and wondered about the BW. I can tell from your trenchant comments on 
aesthetics that I will love the printer.

Much appreciated,

Eric

At 01:02 AM 7/31/2005, you wrote:

>Clayton-
>
>I can give you some feedback, of sorts, on the matte capabilities of
>the 2400.  While I am aware that you may dismiss it for the lack of
>hard figures, I am a very experienced traditional BW printer, having
>worked in BW lab work since 1965.  I believe that I have a good eye
>for a BW image and what makes a print work.
>
>The 2400 that I have been using for the past month or so is producing
>astonishing results over a wide range of prints of negatives with
>which I am familiar.  I am using EEM for proof and Epson VFA for
>final prints, both with the Epson inks (MK).  Although they do not
>look like gelatin DW glossy-matte dried prints, they are comparable
>in every way, and almost certainly better than what could ever have
>been produced with a wet process on matte papers.  One can nitpick
>*any* print to death, but all said and done, this is a remarkable
>process "out of the box."
>
>I realize that this is not a forum about photography, but "the
>print," but ultimately the only real problem in photography is the
>photograph.  The print merely serves the photograph and if the
>photograph is of no interest the quality of the print is entirely
>moot.  So, what I am suggesting is some perspective on these issues
>and a reluctance to dismiss as neophytes and amateurs all those who
>don't see what you see. To this long-trained eye, the Epson 2400 is a
>remarkable achievement and will be a significant contribution to the
>work of many serious, perceptive photographers.
>
>To put my comments on the print issue in some perspective, I have
>always found Ansel Adams a photographic bore who wrote a couple of
>useful, if not entirely original, technical books.  Give me a Lee
>Friedlander, Robert Frank or Cartier-Bresson print any day of the
>week.  So, I suppose that puts our objectives in somewhat different
>camps.
>
>With good wishes and thanks for your contributions,
>
>Walt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones"
><cj@c...> wrote:
> > Hello Tony,
> >
> > >That was one of the more interesting posts I've read in awhile,
> > >on a topic of particular interest to me at the moment.  In my
> > >studio, I have a Epson 4000 as my main printer for B&W.  I'm
> > >using the standard Epson UC inkset with Eboni Black instead of
> > >the Epson MK and using QTR or BO.  I was thinking of adding the
> > >2400 as sort of "test bed" to see if I wanted to upgrade the 4000
> > >to the 4800.  Think I'll wait for some more reviews of the K3
> > >inkset.
> >
> > At $850 that's an expensive test bed - maybe I saved you a lot of
> > money <g>.  It's always tough knowing what to do when a brand new
> > system comes out.  It seems worse in this case because all the
> > reviewers, and even the early users, are going on about how great
>the
> > glossy prints are, and many don't even mention MK/matte prints.  I
> > have yet to see a really thorough review or user report on
>MK/matte.
> >
> >
> >
> > >My only problem with BO is that I frequently get
> > >microbanding that I haven't figured out how to get rid of.
> >
> > It seems to vary from one printer to another.  I have a Carl
>Schofield
> > 4000 BO print that's one of the finest I've ever seen and has no
> > dither banding.  From that I thought that all 4000s would be that
>way,
> > but learned later it wasn't so.  I cured it on my 2200 with a head
> > alignment at a supposedly less than optimal setting, but it worked.
> > The tiny amount that is there requires a loupe to see it.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Clayton
> >
> >
> > Info on black and white digital printing at
> > <http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm>http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
>
>
>
>
>Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
>resources as they are often being updated.
>
><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
>If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
>to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
>this same page.
>
>Please follow these basic guidelines:
>- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
>to keep them short.
>- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
>flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed 
>from the membership without notice.
>- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital 
>B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
>removed from the membership.
>- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
>guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group 
>Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the 
>Files section:
><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
>BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
>PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE 
>"OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL 
>NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, 
>CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 
>DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE 
>LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE 
>PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH 
>DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE 
>DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR 
>ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR 
>CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; 
>OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
>
>
>
>SPONSORED LINKS
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+technique&w1=Digital+photography+technique&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+software&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=179&.sig=8HQ55AQFB376U15T8mciBw>Digital 
>photography technique 
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography&w1=Digital+photography+technique&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+software&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=179&.sig=HWbuIJnfUOqUXbf2wbpZdw>Digital 
>photography 
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+software&w1=Digital+photography+technique&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+software&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=179&.sig=zE6JoNQjSwvUyMC9sHw3NA>Digital 
>photography software
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Photography+school&w1=Digital+photography+technique&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+software&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=179&.sig=pnzUJW8CPs8cfkRRUNz99w>Photography 
>school 
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Professional+digital+photography&w1=Digital+photography+technique&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+software&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=179&.sig=Xu8RR7dXrAL3n40frDlehQ>Professional 
>digital photography 
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Stock+photography&w1=Digital+photography+technique&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+software&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=179&.sig=bG4mempkge509aNFosmKFQ>Stock 
>photography
>
>
>----------
>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>    *  Visit your group 
> "<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint>DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" 
> on the web.
>    *
>    *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>    * 
> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 
>
>    *
>    *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the 
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>----------
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 7/28/2005

  ----------



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 7/28/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.