--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@c...> wrote: snip... > Are they more opaque than other pigment sets? I think of opaqueness > as being caused by full coverage of the paper, where BO get's it > luminance/translucence from allowing bare paper to show...are you > thinking of something different? No, we're talking about the same thing, and it's an interesting issue to me. I think the whole concept of multiple density K inks and partitioning them to their apropriate part of the tonal scale is pretty much the antithesis of what you like about BO printing <G>. Yes, a LOT of covereage. The more partitions and inks you add, the higher the dot count everywhere, in all parts of the scale. So, if we allow the probablity of coverage or the lack of it being responsible for the luminousity you prefer in BO prints, then K7, with more coverage than ever before, may just be the least interesting development in mono inkjet printing for you yet! I think it will be very interesting to hear what you think of how they look. Tyler
Message
K7 coverage was Re: 2400 B&W And Coloration
2005-08-06 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.