> I believe I recall the primary problem with optical brighteners in > paper being that they have a tendency to lose their whiteness over > time. Yes, the affect on the pigments or paper other than the color of the paper is not clear. Some of the older OBAs apparently had reactive byproducts that attacked the image or substrate (like the original RC papers). On the other hand, some brightened papers do very well on Wilhelm tests. > I'm assuming this shows up as "yellowing", ... Yes, the yellowing usually occurs relatively early in a fade test and then stabilizes. I think the following spectrophotometer Lab (a, b) numbers from an EEM fade test are typical: Before fade test EEM paper white (a, b) = (1.26, -3.82) After the fade test (a, b) = (-0.89, 3.70) I believe this is a delta E of 7.8. The most obvious change is along the "b" (yellow-blue) axis, with the paper going from -3.82 blue to +3.7 yellow. So, the paper starts the fade test looking bright white and ends the test looking like one of the non-OBA, "natural" papers. I like the natural papers, which stay essentially the same in these tests. I personally don't like the way the brightened papers look (too cold) next to my matte board. Additionally, however, I don't like the idea that someone might open up one of my matted prints and see a "shadow" from the over-matte. The yellowing of the paper will not give a feeling of confidence in the quality of the materials. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] OBA's - what's the downside (and how much)?
2005-08-06 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.