And what good is an expensive print, purchased from a professional, that changes dramatically with time..due to the use of fugitive dye based inks?
If used by a commercial photographer to produce a print that is later "scanned" or used in prepress work...I think it is fine.
If sold as a Fine Art print for assumed hundreds of dollars...I think different.
Of course some people get paid to create sculptures in ice...so permanence is not everything.
Steadman
----- Original Message -----
From: mtucker508
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Neutral RGB Grayscale
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., SKID Photography
<skid@b...> wrote:
> I have never heard of a metamerism problem with dye based
inks...I thought it was strictly a pigment ink
> problem.
Harvey, Mike,
I'll just throw in my two cents here. I seem to be the king of trying
(read: fighting) to print B/W with color inks. In my neurotic search
for long life prints and stability, I just switched back (again) to
Generations4. It supposedly had "less" metamerism than other
pigments. In the last day or so, I've had to admit to myself that I
must switch inks AGAIN; the metamerism is simply FAR too
much. I have been just "looking the other way" in regard to this,
but it's just gotta happen when I return from this new trip.
I had been using MIS 6-color "1270-type inks" in my 7000, and
the contrast and punch is killer, with absolutely NO metamerism
at all. I could ask nothing more from these inks, short of wanting
them to be stable in fifty or so years. I just put up my first real
show, and all the prints (36 big ones) are made with the MIS
dyes, and they look great on the wall; night or day; tungsten or
daylight.
Just this morning on the way to coffeemaker, in my underwear, I
walked past this 24x48" print that's thumbtacked to the wall, near
the front window. It looked noticeably green; so much that it took
me back. But last night, as I went to bed, I walked past it and it hit
me how nice it looked -- warm, sepia, perfect.
I have owned a 7500 (sent it back). I have used other
Generations inks in my first 7000 (stopped). Now, this with the
Gen4. Thank God I'm leaving for a few weeks so I can not deal
with this til January.
The question you (I) have to ask is: what good is a print that lasts
forever, if you don't even like it today?
-MT
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Neutral RGB Grayscale
2001-12-14 by Steadman Uhlich
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.