Carl- Thanks. I missed this the first time around and they are much more in line with my visual impression. Because I find these ABW prints very convincing visually, I assumed the only issue was whether the color content would contribute to instability in the print. A second thought- it might be possible for someone so inclined to find that spot on the toning "circle" (in the ABW driver) where the selected tone matched the black ink colors and no color need be added. That assumes that the three blacks are the same color. To me, visually, the LK looks warmer than the other two. In case, I don't think it has been established that these amounts of UC inks are actually a stability problem. Walt --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Frost" <bob@f...> wrote: > Peter, Carl, & Walt, > > AFAIK there is no black-only mode in my Windows Epson driver - this must be > just a Mac thing. > > As for the AdvancedB&W mode, there is no need to peer at prints looking for > dots of different colors. Just print a patch to file and decode the file and > you can see exactly how many dots of each color are used in that patch. I > posted the results for my R2400 in AdvancedB&W mode using the default > Neutral/Darker setting on Premium Glossy. In case you didn't see them, here > is a summary again:- > > > "Looking at the printer files (with help from Roy Harrington) of 21 neutral > patches (from 0-255) it seems that the three blacks are the main inks used > throughout the range. The PK ink is > used from 0-90, the lk ink from 0-170, and the llk ink from 20-250. No inks > are used at 255 unless you check the Highlight Point Shift box, as I > explained in an earlier post. > > The neutral toning is done with light magenta and light cyan througout the > whole range 0-250, and yellow is also used from 5-250. Amounts of toning are > variable, but at 210 for example (where only the smallest dots are used for > each ink) 72% of the ink was llk, 16% lm, 10% lc, and 1% Y. At 250, the llk > was 82%, with 9% lm, 7.5% lc, and 1.5% Y. > > Further down the scale, I can't directly compare the % of the different inks > because the blacks, and occasionally the lm, use medium drops as well as > fine, and I don't know the exact size ration of the three sizes of drops > (does anyone else?), whereas the others usually use just fine drops." > > > I have now found some figures for the sizes of the different drops, so I > could work out the exact proportions of dots for all the 21 patches, but I'm > not sure its worth the effort! > > Bob Frost. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "wwodets" <odets@c...> > > > Carl- > > I've examined several ABW (not "BO") prints under a 7-35X Nikon zoom > microscope and I've never seen anything like the amount of color in > your scan. What I've seen is perhaps 10% of that amount of color and > that little bit only in the extreme, very thin highlights. What you > show there is completely unlike anything I've seen from this printer > in ABW. Perhaps the ABW actually uses less color than the "black" > mode or perhaps these prints are all over the board. It is amazing > how obtuse Epson is about communicating about these products.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: 2400 in "black" mode - NOT BO mode
2005-08-07 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.