John, Yes, Luster does have brighteners in it; Premium Semigloss and Gloss don't. > As to Wilhelms test data, I still wonder about the long term effects > of climate and temperature on that rc base. I agree, the polyethylene barrier is an issue I'm concerned with too. Overall, I think we are best off with the pigs encapsulated inside a sandwich of polyethylene and some laminate or coating. Protecting the pigs from the environment seems like a good thing to do. But, how good these barrier substances are adds some uncertainty. For coating I like either a Wilhelm test or the use of a substance that has been used and accepted by the conservationist types (like Rohm & Haas B72 [Lascaux]). I'm somewhat encouraged when I see that polyethylene is what is used in join replacement technologies. Of course, there are probably all sorts of different types of this basic chemical, but it seems to be highlight thought of for a number of purposes. The Wilhelm accelerated aging tests also give some confidence, although accelerated aging testing has much more uncertainty to it than accelerated fade testing. > ... 20 years. > Most of the fiber prints look the same as they always did. But all of > the rc prints, whether color or black and white (that I fixed and > washed myself) seem brittle and dried out to me. Now some of this may > have to do with the chemical processing but I still wonder what this > plastic would look like in 30 years much less 300. That is basically my experience also. I don't fully trust the RC yet -- may never. But it has attributes that make it a very strong contender for many uses. > On a side note ... > Breathing Color called me and tried to sell me on a new canvas they > have just released with a "whole new" type of brightening process that > does not involve the yellowing ob's now used in other inkjet products. There are, apparently, a number of different brighteners. Many seem to be dyes that absorb UV and re-emit as bluish light. Dyes fade. That is what the "yellowing" appears to be. There is no way to know how long a new brightener will last without testing it -- just another source of uncertainty. > ... I've always wondered why they > couldn't just use some form of Titanium white pigment for brightening > canvas and paper as has been used for centuries in other art media > without apparent problems, .... or did it yellow too... I, too, thought everyone would just use titanium white, but Kodak says it was that brightener that wrecked the early RC papers. Titanium dioxide (I think that's what was used) apparently put out very reactive oxidants that cracked the early polyethylene. (Titanium dioxide is apparently even being used in a direct solar hydrogen generator. It seems to act as a catalyst when light hits it, breaking up water [humidity] into its constituents, which then, apparently, proceed to attack whatever is around.) Paul www.PaulRoark.com > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" > <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > (Pardon my jumping in.) > > > > Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper and UltraSmooth share the top spots > on the > > Wilhelm dark storage ratings (see 9800 test at > > http://www.wilhelm-research.com/epson/9800.html) at > 300 years. > Both are > > also OBA free. > > > > Glossy paper has a huge dmax, and when sprayed or laminated glossy > paper is > > probably the most physically durable medium we have. Between the > paper and > > coating technologies, I think the surface will be whatever we want. > > Bronzing is going to be history soon (and already is if coated or > > laminated). > > > > "RC" or "barrier" papers have, in my view, a huge future even at the > high > > end. > > > > (But tape-hung matte under glass -- or, better yet, in a > www.clearbags.com > > envelope -- is still the easiest.) > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] What's up with Epsons Glossy Papers
2005-08-07 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.