Hello Duane, >I really wonder if we won't need a considerable amount of help >from the paper folks to accomplish this as well as the ink people... Interesting ideas. I don't know where the final solution lies, maybe with something entirely new that hasn't been invented yet. I'm just happy that things continually get better and I have confidence that the trend won't stop. >I've been thinking of your exchanges with Tyler as regards your >perceptions of the colors added to alter ink tone as opposed to >BO prints. I know there can be exreme metamerism shown in trying >to make neutral tones from color inks and I wonder if your >impressions might not be due to a more subtle evidencing of that >same factor. Maybe you are simply very sensitive visualy to those >effects. I don't think metamerism is really the issue. And I don't know that I'm more sensitive to colors than any one else, it's just that we get used to things. I suspect that most of the people who don't mind the mixing of colors have been looking mostly at mixed inks because that's been the main trend. But there is a big (to me) difference in a tone, neutral or otherwise, that results from a single ink's response to a paper, and one that is made up of several colors in an attempt to imitate that tone. I have never found mixed inks to be very convincing. And then of course there's the longevity issue. Sometimes I despair of the struggle, the constant time consuming and expensive experimenting, the endless search for the holy grail. Sometimes I think (for a brief moment) that I should forget about all this and just go buy a 2400 and make prints and be happy with what it produces. But then I look and these sample K3 prints and I can't do it. It simply isn't what I'm searching for. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
K7 coverage was Re: 2400 B&W And Coloration
2005-08-07 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.