Digital BW, The Print

Steve,

I'm too against fragmenting, but I feel QTR has much more into it to 
just be debated on the DBWP group : not that I disregards this group, 
but IMHO QTR is not (yet?) well documented enough despite Tom Moore's 
tutorial. So it needs additional early and experimented users' 
feedback which would not necessarily appeal the DBWP group being too 
much specific like precisely the grey ICC.

So I personally favor following up on both in search for experiences 
(in fact I also read but not post on piezo group and a couple of 
others). At the end of the day, this is a question of who 
participates/responds and where to post to debate with these 
people... 

What I tend to avoid is to mail Roy directly out of the group (though 
I did once) since despite his support and prompt reply and having 
felt frustrated at the little information I found on the group, I 
think it's far better to share Roy's reply having it public.

The lastest ressource I'm looking for is an ICC one : color.org is 
not so "accessible", and I found nothing on Yahoo groups. I'm 
currently following sf.net lcms this is a profiler development 
project, lots of info but really hard to follow, I saw Roy posting 
there too.

As always thanks for your replies and help.

Olivier


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale 
<stevekale@b...> wrote:
> Olivier
> 
> No problem.  I have not joined the QTR group yet (in general I am 
against
> fragmentation of this list - it is powerful due to its breadth).  I 
am not
> so far in front of you on this stuff so sorry if I am not 
definitive at
> times.
>