Steve, > I must admit I find this subject of perceived/observed colouration in a > greyscale comprising colour dots rather interesting and, at times, > amusing. > With regard to the former, Clayton (for one) is claiming that he can > readily > sense the use of colour dots in the greyscale even when these individual > dots are not observable at 6x magnification at a distance of 2 inches. I'm reminded of the debate with respect to how much "sharpness" the eye can detect. While most find that humans can separate only about 5 line pairs per millimeter at normal viewing distance, the consensus is that we can detect edge sharpness increases up to at least the equivalent to 30 lp/mm, with some claims going up to 100 lp/mm. So, I think there may be an argument that color dots have some sort of impact beyond what can actually be "seen" as individual dots. > ... I am sure this would make > interesting fodder for those who scientifically study colour and human > vision. I am sure that such people could construct some appropriate > rigorous tests. Probably, but in a simple double-blind test that included BO, I'll bet the BO aficionados would prefer BO every time. This is because the BO style, which I think of as the "Tri-X" look, is usually rather distinctive not only in its texture but also in the hue of the ink. The more interesting test would be just between 2400 v. a blended B&W inkset with no color dots but color mixed into the inks. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] K7 coverage was Re: 2400 B&W And Coloration
2005-08-08 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.