Mark,
I truly sympathize with you...and so often think like you too (or so it seems...did you notice that Joey Ramone just got inducted in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame...hard to believe a punker could do that in a mainstream museum..)...anyway...back to the thread...
I read your reasoning down below. I don't buy it....Or, I would not buy it...
Your "mild disclaimer" is not enough to make a difference in your reputation.
What if you sell a bunch of lower priced (how low is low?) prints of the very best images....and then the prints go "fugitive" in a few months or a year or two...how satisfied will those buyers be?
Not very I can tell you.
I spent some money on a BW art print (silver) and it went bad after two years and I am pissed...the print is ruined and nothing worth displaying now.
So...given that dyes are known to have fugitive properties ( do you really trust the 200 year claims of Epson?) ....then I think you are simply selling your images cheap, and cheapening your reputation as a printer too.
In short, I think it will come back to haunt you.
Generally, people buy art for display on their home/office walls. Most people keep it there for years. Most will spend $100 or more to have a big print framed. Most will not want to waste money on fading prints.
Of course, those same people may be buying some "limited edition prints from...the painter of light..."
Just an opinion...
Steadman
----- Original Message -----
From: mtucker508
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Neutral RGB Grayscale
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Steadman Uhlich"
<steadmanuhlich@k...> wrote:
> And what good is an expensive print, purchased from a
professional, that changes dramatically with time..due to the use
of fugitive dye based inks?
Steadman,
I totally totally hear you. But what to do, my friend? You're in a
pinch either way you go.
I love the feeling that I have right now with these pigments, that
when a print pops out of the 7000, I know (think) it's gonna be
here til the cows come home.
But then, carry that same stable print to the window, and watch it
turn green.
So then, you reload the dyes, and the print looks great in any
room, but then you start sweating when you're packaging up the
print to ship it out.
But today, I'm leaning toward this scenario: sell my prints cheap,
print them with 1270 dyes, and then put some kind of mild
disclaimer in there with them, and then justify it that way. In my
distorted view of life, if somebody's paying much less than
"normal", whatever normal is, then if it fades somewhat in 25
years, then I won't feel "that" bad about it, whatever "that bad" is.
I'd rather feel bad about the print in 25 years, than today, when I
carry it to the window.
-Mark Tucker
Between rock and hard place
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Prints to Dye for...or Pigments are Better...
2001-12-15 by Steadman Uhlich
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.