Steven Karafyllakis wrote: >Unfortunately the 7600/9600 machinses have a different damper setup: >the're all attached to a frame that makes it necessary to pull all the >dampers. That creates huge problems that require many cleaning cycles >to clear up. If they have used that or a similar setup in the K3 prin >ters, you don't want to go that route. > > > > I guess the K3's are more in 10000 style (similar head construction + assembly of the heads) and that's worse for the damper cleaning etc than the 9600 version. On the last it is still possible to clean and replace the dampers manually. The 10000 heads/damper assembly is more or less a solid block that can't be separated. The dampers are big so it takes time to get them clogged but that's the only advantage. I'm using other methods to change inks on the 10000 as I dare not take the head assembly apart and I'm not really a coward in this metier. The answer on cleaning the dampers, inklines and ink changing on the new machines will most likely be with reverse flow and carts that can suck the ink out like I already do Electric valves in the inklines will be a new thing too. They are needed to prevent ink flowing back from the heads-inklines into the carts that are substantially lower than the head assembly. Membrane valves in the carts as an extra prevention (like the 10000 carts have) will make refilling without changes to the cart impossible. However the 4800 though a K3 printer is similar to the 4000,9600,7600 concept of head and damper design. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Purging the K line on a 4800 (African style)
2005-08-10 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.