--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., antonisphoto@y... wrote: (snip) > And if you can, > > would it give you any greater boost in screen-to-print calibration > > accuracy then just eyballing it? > > ---- It should. But it could also be overkill, depending on how stable everything > else in your system is day-to-day. You may prefer to have a standard file with > a full tonal range and at the beginning of a new session, make a print and > check it against a known Dot Curve. I mostly eyeball for grayscales and use > the instruments for color. Some of us have better eyeballs of course. I have to confess to taking a print to where I like it on screen, printing it, and from then on start to ignore the monitor. I start doing adjustments to the image file based on what I see in the print. Like I do in the darkroom. This feels intuitive but I wonder if I am wasting paper in an ink this way. This is probably unavoidable in the final tweaking stage. Thanks, Martin
Message
Re: Scanning workflow for BW - Dot Gain calculations
2001-08-12 by mwesley250@earthlink.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.