I have to disagree with you. I never printed anything but matte papers on my 2400 and the amount of control with the new driver and the quality of the images with the K3 inks is a significant improvement. There are two things that I see on this list quite often. One is Paralysis by Analysis, people seem to spend more time analyzing curves and step wedges then printing. They are always looking for a shortcut instead of experimenting to determine what works best for them. Second people have a tendency to give expert opinions about what they know very little about, such as printing two images and the analyzing the printer. I have printed over 100 images on my 2400 and still do not consider myself an expert on that printer. These comments are not directed at any individuals, I consider this list to be an invaluable source of information. That said, I will still continue to read each message in detail, go figure. Gary www.pbase.com/garyallenbrown ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Kale" <stevekale@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 1:39 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2400 Vs. 2200 (4800 vs 4000, 7800 vs.......) I think there has been plenty of posts which would help you with this. The properties of the new K3 inks have been discussed a lot - the fact that this discussion has related to the 4800 (first to market - the 7800 and 9800 are only just now available) at times is irrelevant for the most part. The matte paper greyscale output has been improved over the original UC inks with the introduction of LLK. But with MIS greyscale/quad inks you had LLK already. Hence I think you will find that the true advancement associated with the K3 inks vs "MIS greyscale" inks is really the performance on photo papers - namely significant improvements re gloss differential and bronzing. Aside from the inks, the Epson Adv B&W driver offers significant ease of use enhancements for many users. It's not perfect, but a dramatic improvement over its predecessors. Only fade tests will determine whether there is weakness associated with the use of yellow ink in the greyscale. Some have claimed they can see subtle colour shifts in the greyscale ramp but I really do think this is not the case - they may see/"perceive" it but I certainly don't. I see a nice smooth greyscale and easily determinable hue with the picker. This is a massive jump from the 21/2200 and more akin to Imageprint output. So I think that's about it. If you like photo paper output then the K3 inks are a significant advance. If you only print matte then they are less so because you can get 3 shades of grey from a variety of sources. Both the 21/2200 and the 2400 (4000 and 4800) are controllable with the same RIPs. > From: mxgo95747 <mxgo95747@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 02:21:30 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2400 Vs. 2200 (4800 vs 4000, 7800 vs.......) > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" > <cj@c...> > wrote: >> Hello Martin, >> >>> how do prints on an Epson 2200 using MIS Assoc. inks and a RIP >>> compare vs a 2400 for both matte and photo K inks. >> >> Do you mean MIS color inks or UT7 grayscale inks? > > > Grey scale. I should have been more specific. > > Martin Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2400 Vs. 2200 (4800 vs 4000, 7800 vs.......)
2005-08-10 by Gary Brown
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.