Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2400 Vs. 2200 (4800 vs 4000, 7800 vs.......)

2005-08-10 by Steve Kale

Didn't mean to make you a "poster boy"!  It's just that you are a person
known to us on the list who has expressed a preference for more greys rather
than less.  My point was simply that the answer to the question being asked
is not simple and depends on a whole host of factors and preferences.  There
is no one answer.  Any response would begin with "well it depends on.....)

Steve


> From: Tyler Boley <tyler@...>

> 
> Steve and all, I seem to have  unwittingly become the poster boy here
> for multiple K mono printing. I just want to say that there are very
> many pro and non-pro printers out there using quad (and more) systems
> happily printing away, doing nice stuff.
> They just don't happen to hang around on lists much. A bit of cause
> for some introspection here...
> The 4+ part mono printing systems are out there from a few suppliers,
> represent a significant contribution to state of the art inkjet
> monochromatic printing, and seem to be under-represented on this list.
> It all gets down to the prints and the results, not the number of Ks
> or whatever.
> Tyler

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.