Can you still buy a 4000? > From: John Moody <moodymz3@...> > > Good point about the RIPs. I tried to get better results from my 2200 by > use of a RIP. I learned a lot in the process; mostly that the 2200 does not > have the features of the 4000 such as hardware microweaving. I abandoned > the 2200 RIP pursuit, and back to using the Epson driver with custom > profiles. > The available dither algorithms is dependent on the RIP and its driver. I > also found that using the highest printing resolution can disable the > variable-dot-size, which prevents using the newer 2-bit dither algorithms. > I was not able to compare the difference as the 2200 was not supported for > that feature using the RIPs I tried, StudioPrint and Evolution. > > I print very low quantities, and fear that I would have ink problems with > stationary cartridges like the 4000 has. Any thoughts on that? I really > enjoy printing my own work, and would consider a 4000 if there was a way to > keep it functioning properly at low usage. > > Best regards, > John Moody
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: BO "graininess"
2005-08-11 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.