--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "bghess_sp" <bghess_sp@y...> wrote: > Just installed the 4800 - simply amazing. Fast, quiet, BIG. I've been > using a 2200 with MIS UT7 inks up to this point. Initial comparison of > a print that I thought looked great with MIS - doesn't really compare > to the K3 ABW print. Blacks are blacker, tonal gradation is smoother, > just an all around better looking print. Asthetically, which is what I > think the original question on this thread was asking, the K3 print > looks a lot better. This is out of the box, too. B&W printing just got > a whole lot better, not to mention easier (a hell of a lot more > expensive, too!) Paper? Martin
Message
[Digital BW] Re: 2400 Vs. 2200 (4800 vs 4000, 7800 vs.......)
2005-08-11 by mxgo95747