Yes, I know that no one wants to get into a bitter arguement over this and I recognize the potential:) ...but has anyone compared results from Paul's VM and John Woolf's FS 1160 workflow? ...or being less confrontational, willing to say, "I use X and get great results." Can anyone confirm John's assertation that the Cone driver is no better than Epson with a 1160? thanks for all the hand-holding! mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@t...> wrote: > If you want to use piezo inks or MIS FS you need the piezo driver. If not, > the MIS VM would be fine using Paul's curves. There is no one 'best' > solution - a lot of people here argue stongly for particular brands/inks > combinations. it all depends on what you like. The only provisos are that > you use the necessary technical bits i.e. the correct driver for the inks. > I'd rather have the driver and handfill the carts - you could buy the inks > in 4oz bottles and fill them yourself. So the cheapest route is for MIS VM > using either CIS or handfilling the carts - next up is the Cone kit with MIS > FS afterwards. You maybe able to do a deal with someone to buy the inks. But > an initial purchase of 56USD for MIS VM isn't a bad place to start. You may > not need anything else. > > Julian
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Inks, Epson vs. Cone etc. was:(more newbie q's)
2001-12-15 by markhahn2000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.