Martin, there are different kinds of "profiling" in this regard. The simple one, that deals with matching a grayscale file to a grayscale print can be done right now in PS 6. Simply calculating dot gain (OK, that may require an instrument, though eyeballing is mighty close) and saving the resulting gray setting becomes a profile in the "eyes" of Photoshop. Then there is the more complex one of dealing with separating the 8 or 16bit grays into the 4 or 6 inks. I believe you are already ahead of me on that one, but my previous experience point to the necessity for a RIP capable of 4 or 6 color printing before any profiles can be made meaningfully. In other words gray-to-CcMmYK would be preferrable to gray-to-RGB-to <unknown Epson separation algorithm>. But either of the above solutions still require a way to bring the hardware into a repeatable, linearized, calibrated state. That means that for a given digital value it has to produce the same exact density of ink on paper. A tall order for most desktop/toy printers. It's probably why the wide-format Epsons cost that much more. But even then, plotting graphs to check for drifting (what my original message was about) should be a regular part of any serious printing "regiment". Antonis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "mwesley3" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: ..... There is a real need for a gray ink printer profiling > software package that creates true printer profiles and separation > curves unique to each individual printer/ink/paper combination and > allows us to constantly up date them as our equipment and materials > shift. Not likely to be cheap but maybe someday.
Message
Re: Piezo consistency: Colorimetric data. Profiling issues
2001-12-15 by antonisphoto
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.