If all you did was print them straight away, as is, you are unlikely to see any difference. The advantage comes in editing - 16 bit (actually just the bit depth of your camera, so just 10/12bits - I don't know what the 20D has) will allow you considerably more editing without degradation of the file leading to posterization and other issues. The only downside is storage space and memory use - both cheap. BTW I am very surprised you don't like ACR in CS2 (it kills C1 for example) > From: Gary Brown <baffin@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:46:48 -0700 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] 8 bit vs 16 bit conversions > > Could someone elaborate, on the advantages of using 16 bit conversions vs 8 > bit. > > My digital capture is done with a 20D in RAW (obviously). I use Raw Shooter > to convert, I prefer it over the converter in CS2. > > Thanks, > > Gary > > > www.pbase.com/garyallenbrown
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 8 bit vs 16 bit conversions
2005-08-18 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.