The dpreview article mentioned below may have been where I saw a series of images that compared the various methods. I really could not see significant difference among the top half of the approaches, which included GF. But, as mentioned before, the nature of the image makes a difference. I use GF to up-sample images where I must. It seems to avoid stair-stepping and preserve sharp edges reasonably well. No doubt the state of the art has advanced now; I have not tried s-spline but have seen dramatic comparisons to bi-cubic. My conclusion, however, is that these programs are just marginal improvements to images that really needed to start as higher resolution files in the first place. There is no magic here and no substitute for good initial information capture and scanning. The programs cannot, in my experience, manufacture fine detail that looks real. Paul www.PaulRoark.com > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > brucenorikane > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:53 AM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Genuine Fractals > > "john dean" <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > ... > > It certainly would be nice to take the same file and res it up > > different ways to do a comparison test. I'll be glad to do the Miranda > > test of it and or PSCS2. > > there was a great thread on DPReview that compared interpolated > images. The images were in the thread. People discussed and voted > on their favorites. The voting was not unaminous, but Qimage's vector > (test was before pyramid availability) and GF seemed to score highest. > the thread is still there, but the images seem to have disappeared: > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1003&message=7642362 > > There is a followup posted by Qimage's Mike Chaney that compares his > newer pyramid interpolation to several others: > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1003&message=7642362 > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Genuine Fractals
2005-08-18 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.