Absolutely correct. Sorry, I got my numbers backwards. In truth, the "zones" I delineated are more of an abstraction, as Ken mentioned. Whether the actual dynamic range were 5 zones or 13, in the end it depends on the contrast settings as well as the in camera conversions or post camera processing as to how those values will be distributed in the final saved image. I hope I didn't confuse anyone. Eric www.ericashworth.net On Aug 19, 2005, at 10:43 AM, Hal Gage wrote: > I think that you have your zones reversed. In photosensitometry (and > Adams' application of it), zone 1 represents mostly film base fog > (nearly no exposure) thus, deepest shadow, or in your "12 bit" > example, > 1 level of gray. > > Thanks for sharing your analysis. It's what I have read, too other > than > the above. > > Hal Gage
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 8 bit vs 16 bit conversions
2005-08-19 by Eric Ashworth
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.