> The digital+platinum or digital+silver methodology has a rich > potential worth pursuing.There is just not enough time in > this world to do it all.I'm surprise we don't have someone on > this list who is only doing that. > > John John, I have made a fair number of enlarged negs for pt/pd printing. While certainly the in-camera LF neg will be "best", the lure of using a smaller camera and digital post-processing is strong. I have made enlarged negs using an imagesetter, inkjet and darkroom. The problem with an imagesetter is that it is old technology (I was at a press check yesterday for a publication using some of my pix, and the owner and I got to talking about this subject. He said he would make me an offer I can't refuse on of their imagesetters...no thanks). In addition, you will probably find that the common 2400 ppi imagesetter is not sufficient. It requires (a) a 4800 ppi imagesetter and (b) an operator who can understand what you want, both rare items. If you want to try that, as I recall the Camera & Darkroom store in Santa Fe has a connection with a pre-press there that has a high-res imagesetter and understands the requirements for an enlarged neg. I remain to be convinced that an inkjet negative will do the job, though I have certainly tried. I must tell you that the finest pt/pd prints I have seen in person, i.e. held in my lusting little hands as opposed to viewing through glass) are made from small camera (35mm and 6x7cm) negs enlarged in the darkroom to 20x24. These are from Tom Millea (www.tommillea.com) and David Kennedy (http://www.davidmichaelkennedy.com/indexold.html). Also to be considered is that the papers for pt/pd are textured and hide a lot of flaws, unlike silver paper. Anyway, FWIW that's my experience. Now I'm going to have to order some of the Lenswork prints to see how things have progressed (out of intellectual curiousity - I don't want to go back in the darkroom and anyway, my wife is converting it into a room with lots of overhead UV lights for seedlings or whatever before they go the garden). --Ken
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: John Sexton's comment on B&W print
2005-08-20 by Ken Carney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.