Eric and Clayton; I know it is off topic, but I was the one who started out with the all-in-one-flex comment. I love both of your contraptions . . . oops, excuse me, your ultra most recent bestest mostest professionalest cameras, SO, have you ever seen the picture of that fellow (I believe he was originally a Californian) with his "camera van"? The entire thing is covered with cameras glued? screwed? all over it (some of them actually working, being fired from inside . . . a whole new meaning to "drive by shooting") . . . and an obviously good way to get rid of your "film" cameras whilst waiting for photoshop to do some really akward manipulation ;-) Further Eric, if you are looking for something really cute (and really outrageously expensive I would imagine), Rollei has produced in limited numbers a miniature TLR that has a half-size sensor in it (a la the majority of "35" cameras). all the best Paul Aparycki >I had one of those for awhile, but I much preferred the medium format >RolLeicaFlex. It produced such sensuous and tactile negatives and/or >transparencies, especially when you used the ultrasuperduperchrome >III film produced by Koduji. You can see one here, >http://www.ericashworth.net/images/rolleicaflex.jpg >Eric
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: John Sexton's comment on B&W print
2005-08-21 by Paul Aparycki
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.