Well, now I'm motivated again. My best friend has a really large UV pt/pd rig (he only prints pt from LF negs), so maybe I'll give it a try again. Thank God you don't need a real darkroom for pt/pd --lobster lights are OK and give a kind of warm atmosphere. One thing, when you look at the material cost of a large platinum print (or two or three until you get it right), PR seems like a wild bargain. This is an exciting time in which we live, photographically, yes? So many options. (Speaking of pin holes, one valuable lesson I learned is to take the paper and look at it against a strong backlight to see if any black specks show in a light area -- if so it goes in the trash). --Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On > Behalf Of john dean > Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 6:58 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: John Sexton's comment on B&W print > > Ken, > > I belive there are several good image setter technicians out > there in NY, La, Chicago, and Salt Lake City. But like you > say, they are a dying breed and some of those references I > got 6 months ago may have moved on in their life, as many of > great color dig neg makers have done. Ours here in Atlanta > simply "retired" and there was one one interested in taking > his place. As to darkrooms, mine is gone too. No room. > > But I do have a fantastic 8 tube 7' uv light that is as > bright as daylight that I want to use. I don't really have a > problem with Burkholders method of inkjet negs on trans film > for platinum ( I don't think). Like you say the paper > absorption takes care of a lot of the problems and if you get > a good sized paper I think they can look nice.I belive the > problem is finding the OHP film in sizes larger than > 13x19 that doesn't have pin holes. At least that is what > Pictorico told me when I discussed it with them. The roll > film was flawed and coated differently. I would like to do a > few 20x30 platinum/pallads. > We'll see if it is possible without breaking the bank. I've > only done a few 13x19's so far. But you know no matter how > nice and "rare" these types of prints are, whenever I finish > a session I always say, thank God for pigment inkjet. I > certainly wouldn't want to go through all that every week. > But its fun to have variety and it puts things in perspective. > > Thanks for the info, > > John
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: John Sexton's comment on B&W print
2005-08-21 by Ken Carney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.