>Ken, I don't know what Tom has been up to for a long time, but the >prints I saw long ago were enlarged negs from 35mm polapan. This put >him considerably ahead of the rest by elimnating the interpositive. >Less loss and tonal scale distortion. That film also has (had?) a >beautiful grain structure. 35mm polaroid instant film hasn't been made for a while (about a year and a half to two years now) . . . when you can find Polapan that has been stored in a freezer, people usually want a king's ransom for it if they are willing to let it go. I used it a lot . . . it was absolutely beautiful, and the most fragile stuff I have ever touched in my entire life . . . one breath the wrong way and it would scratch. Paul Aparycki
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: John Sexton's comment on B&W print
2005-08-21 by Paul Aparycki