Thanks Scott, That is interesting. I think it is fairly easy with color when sprayed because both are rc surfaces but matching a good gel sil fiber pt is a lot more difficutlt. What would seem the most difficult would be to match the exact color of a chemically processed print with pigments of any kind. If you can do this with the new Epson pigments and the gloss dif and bronzing are not apparent that says a lot for them and its probably good enough for me. After all how many are going to mix the two surfaces within a portfolio? Did you have to spray that print with something? The comparisons I've seen between UC K2 and K3, at least with color glossy paper, still show a very small amount of surface relief. But with a careful choice of paper you might be able to disguise it completely, as you apparently have been able to do. I may be wrong but I don't sense the perfect glossy media has been produced yet for pigments, and it must be an extremely difficult task. But very soon, from someone, I think we are going to have one, possibly this year. Has anyone used the Kodak glossy papers that eliminate the surface problems? Apparently it only comes in 24" rolls, no longer. Too bad. John
Message
Re: A print comparison in reference to John Sexton's comment on B&W print
2005-08-21 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.