Julian, Bernhard, Just want to toss in that there is a great deal of printer-to-printer variation and you may both be right based on what you each have seen. Martin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@t...> wrote: > All I can tell you is what I see - I have 2 1160s and the results are the > same. FS is better with the Cone driver, although I believe that VM with the > Epson is the same as FS with Cone driver - if oyu use 6 inkprinters. > > Julian > > Julian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bernie Ess" <albatros.bee@w...> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...> > Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 10:54 PM > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Inks, Epson vs. Cone etc. was:(more newbie q's) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@t...> > > > > > > > I'm afraid I disagree totally. I've tried FS with the Epson and W. > > workflow > > > and it is lacking in smoothness and has dots. The Cone driver makes the > > > print head 'fill in' the gaps in the dots and effectively doubles the > res > > of > > > the printer. > > > > Sorry but this is simply wrong - I have print samples of Cone with Piezo, > > MIS FS with Piezo (from Bernd) and I have my own Epson with FS - with the > > right curve - I adjusted the Woolf curve - and the Epson, while being much > > slower - prints with exactly the same smoothness if not finer, tones are > > equal. I don´t see dots - maybe you have a bad sample of the 1160, mine > > doesn´t print dots, under a 7x magnification you see a structure, but its > > not dots. > > > > Greetings Bernhard > > (snip)
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Inks, Epson vs. Cone etc. was:(more newbie q's)
2001-12-16 by mwesley3
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.