Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > On the other hand, when people shoot raw, they typically don't even think > about things like white balance that have no effect on the raw data. At > least they don't if they understand what raw is. I understand what raw is, and I pay very close attention to white balance when shooting raw - as do a great many photographers. One reason is that I rely upon the histogram to insure I am getting the levels I want in the photograph. The displayed histogram on every digital camera I've ever picked up is a histogram of the demosaiced image, with a white balance correction applied. So, if I did not set the correct white balance in the camera at the time of shooting, my histogram will be systematically in error when displayed in camera. That can lead to problems - clipping, if the systematic error reduces levels in a color channel of interest; or excessively lowered signal to noise ratio if the systematic error increases levels. This, in turn, certainly affects BW conversion and the ability to process for printing down the line. This is a major technical reason to set the white balance correctly in camera, when shooting raw. There is also a reason involving convenience. As already mentioned, it is de rigeur to color-meter the light and set this in a digital camera directly. Alternately, you can shoot your gray card and set a white custom balance by selecting that image in-camera with the appropriate menu choices, the camera deriving the color temperature and tint terms necessary to balance images in that light. It is a great convenience, if you are doing either, to have your conversion software automatically respect this setting, rather than having to try to figure out what the setting was, or read it off redundant paper notes you took at the site and type it into your raw converter manually. Clicking on photos of gray cards in the converter works fine, but it is more labor intensive (in some converters, significantly more) than just having the converter read the raw metadata. -- Jeff Medkeff Eagle River, Alaska
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon vs. Canon
2005-08-24 by Jeff Medkeff
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.