Although I own a couple of digital cameras I still use MF film exclusively for my work. Coming from a traditional background I feel more confident with film and film cameras. It's not only understanding the characteristics of various films and their unique qualities but it's also having to create images confidently without the reliance of previewing on the LCD screen. Plus I'm concerned about the reliability of digital when working in remote locations and climate extremes. Granted, photojournalists use digital cameras under extreme conditions but, for me, film is a known quantity and I feel far more secure with it. Not having to lug around a laptop, converters, cables, backup devices, etc. is a real plus. And, in addition to the DVD/HD backup, I like the feel of archiving a real piece of film. And the list goes on. I own and use several MF cameras/systems. I primarily use a Pentax 645 as it's quicker, lighter and a little bit more discreet but also use the larger and heavier P67 for more contemplative tripod work. I use both traditional film (Delta 400) and C-41 films. They both scan very well (Nikon 8000) and film (especially traditional BW film) has a far wider exposure latitude in comparison to most digital CCDs. Although the 67 format provides larger file sizes I've been able to produce large output (30x40) from both formats. I may use up to 60-80 rolls of 220 film per project/trip so scanning can indeed be time consuming. But after the usual edit (from traditional contact sheets!!) I scan perhaps a few dozen images. So it's not any more time consuming than reviewing several hundred downloaded digital images or several darkroom printing sessions. Plus, fortunately for me, scanning in grayscale is a lot quicker. I have several glass carriers so while one is scanning I'm loading a couple more. Someday I would like to make the switch to digital capture but I think I'll be using film for the foreseeable future. Good luck! Rick Murai www.richardmurai.com http://www.hawaii.edu/mjournal/text/issues/descriptions/cambodia04.html > After as much research as possible, I decided to just ask the > question here---very basic but perplexing for me. > > I am a (relatively) long time digital photographer--I came from film > (35mm)--but haven't shot film in quite a number of years. I never > had a darkroom--and don't intend to now. I'm quite proficient in PS, > use Quadtone RIP for printing b/w with my 2200 (a larger format > printer will come eventually, but not the immediate future). BUT-- > I've recently gotten the itch to buy a Pentax 67 as the prices go > lower and lower--but just am not totally sure of the workflow to get > it from camera to printer (and if there is more than one way to skin > a cat). > > Of course, the other question is--is this even reasonable to > consider. I currently shoot with a Canon 20D--have considered FF but > will not make the jump to it with the new 5D--not right now anyhow. > I've prepared a list of pros and cons for the used 67--but, because > I'm digitally minded, will print digitally--is this just crazy? > > I've been reading the John Sexton thread too, but really couldn't > find anything else on the forum while searhing that addresses this-- > and the pros/cons. > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership > without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the > membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND > MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] A bit OT....MF to b/w print
2005-08-26 by R Murai
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.