Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] A bit OT....MF to b/w print

2005-08-26 by Diane Fields

Thanks all for your input and I'll take any more anyone has to give.  

Ken, I have not shot with a 120 film cam--only 35mm.  I posted from the site so you'll see I spent some time with a Pentax 67II today but, of course, didn't shoot any film.  I do have a pro and con list and way up there on the con side is the time/expense of processing/scanning, etc.  I don't print 40" x 60" either--though I have had very large 'posters' made and mounted by a graphics company for a client.  The largest I have had printed (again, for a client) were 18 x 24.  My own prints are limited by my  2200 at 13 x 19 for the time being.

The person at the store today (the mgr) truly believes that the tonality, color and dynamic range just can't be beat by MF (except by LF of course)--he shoots 'casually' with a 20D and an MF for 'serious' work.  He also believes most people probably wouldn't see the difference LOL--and I concur with that--but that isn't really the point for me I guess.

I would like to stress again I'm not interested in a darkroom---but am certainly going to look into some of the 'alternatives' to a full blown darkroom from the suggestions.

BTW--I shoot landscapes,  urban landscapes, 'not quite' macros, and still lifes primarily.  (I do shoot parttime commercially for the furniture and textile industries but digital is great for that--and doesn't enter into this).  I'm pretty proficient in PS, use Quadtone RIP for B/W (not sure if I said that originally) and I lean toward b/w, but seem to be processing more color recently.

Diane Fields
www.pbase.com/picnic

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: kenstrain2000 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 2:19 PM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] A bit OT....MF to b/w print


  Diane,
  here is advice perhaps not even worth 2c, and also against the grain
  of the replies thus far.
  My last (of 3) 120 cameras/systems was sold 18 months ago (SL66 with 3
  Zeiss lenses, wonderful!). 
  The difference is that now I have very much more depth of field for a
  given image quality, no struggles with scanning and no dust spots (wow
  yes!). And, mainly, *much better prints* (but I don't print 40x60).
  The quality issue is fundamental - sensors are many times more
  sensitive to light than any film, in some styles of photography this
  matters, in others it matters not at all. 
  Whether 6x7 is right for you depends a lot on your photographic style.
  It is not clear whether you have used a 120 SLR before but it is
  certainly worth trying one on your normal subject matter before "going
  for it". 

  Good luck!
  Ken





  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
  - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
  - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

  BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    a..  Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on the web.
      
    b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.