"They are delicious, a joy to hold and use, and the optics are the best in class, period." And no "mirror slap". And leaf shutter, too. Add a tri-pod and cable release. One of the best combos I've ever used. Can't be beat. Scott --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, sandersm@a... wrote: > A few observations: > > 1. If you are considering MF but have never shot it before, consider the > Rolleiflex twin-lens reflex as a camera. They are delicious, a joy to hold and > use, and the optics are the best in class, period. And you can buy a good > user on eBay for a few hundred. (Insert all standard disclaimers here.) > Nothing else in MF comes close. > > 2. Someone else, considering a return to film, asked for labs to process > B+W. If you want to give MF film a try but don't want to process your own film > (which, really, is easy and a lot of fun), buy some Kodak 400CN film -- it > gives a B+W image but develops in color C-41 process, so you can have it > developed at your corner one-hour photo. > > 3. As for processing, you can use JOBO tanks without the expense and bulk > of the JOBO bases. You can roll the JOBO tanks on a tabletop by hand, or buy > a used Omega or Beseler roller base for $25. I use JOBO tanks like that all > the time for my 4x5-inch and 5x7-inch LF work, and they are dreams. > > 4. Which leads to my final thought: If you're going to take the plunge > and come back to film, why not do it in style and go to a large format camera? > There is nothing, absolutely nothing so inspiring as a big sheetfilm negative > fresh from the fixer. For the sort of work you are doing -- landscapes and > still lifes -- a view camera is perfectly-suited. The learning curve is not > steep. The equipment is cheap. And the results are incomparable. If > nudity does not offend, stop by my web page, www.mcnew.net -- I am shooting nude > portraiture entirely in 4x5-inch and 5x7-inch formats. > > 5. One of the benefits of shooting large format is that the Epson flatbed > scanners will give you more than enough scanning power to get a first-class > inkjet print -- that will save you a lot of cash and bother on the scanning side. > BUT BE WARNED! Once you start messing with big negatives like these, you > might conclude, as I have, that they really want to be printed onto silver > gelatin papers. And then you will end up doing something stupid like buying a > 4x5 enlarger and and > > Sanders McNew > www.mcnew.net > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: A bit OT....MF to b/w print
2005-08-27 by scott_now_coming
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.