The saving grace of film was that at least it made people be a little more selective about their images. Digital is a wonderful step forward (in the hands of those who have someting between their ears), but it is also a plaque a thousand times worse than cancer or aids. Paul Aparycki That is complete nonsense, photographers that shoot film and are supported by companies with deep pockets will shoot huge amounts of film. There is a photographer that traveled with the naturalist that spent two years walking across central Africa. He is publishing a book of his photographs (with I believe 106 images). Over the two years he shot 25,000 images. He was supported by National Geographic. If you don't like Digital that's up to you, but enough is enough. Calling Digital a plague (I think that's what you meant, not "plaque") a thousand times worse than cancer or aids is way over the top. Gary
Message
Re: [Digital BW] A bit OT....MF to b/w print
2005-08-27 by Gary Brown
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.