I have no problem with digital. I have a very serious problem with mediocrity and the millions of feeble excuses it seems a lot of digital shooters use to justify it. While not subscribing to the "ooooooommm Zen" attitude that many profess regarding large format shooting . . . i.e. the contemplative approach that allows for "better" images, I do agree that slowing down before you hit the damn button makes for a better picture. Most people don't, and in the digi age . . . well, you have heard it here a thousand times, "shoot, shoot, shoot, shoot, shoot!" . . . then sadly, much of it makes it onto the web . . . gallery after gallery of "maybes" and "it's pretty good" . . . the only person that it serves is the ego of the so-so photographer who wasn't too sure of what they were doing in the first place. I shoot a little in digital, but mostly in film, predominately in MF and LF, up to and including on some jobs 8x10 . . . my clients who pay me a good amount of money are NOT screaming "digital, digital, digital, digital!", I guess they don't know what you know . . . maybe you should talk to them and teach them something. As for my spelling, THAT is a major faux pas, I am well read and pride myself on getting it right . . . I don't use or believe in spell-checkers. I apologize for that and hope that you will sleep better tonight. A plaGue? yes, it is . . . borne of laziness and stupidity (which is why is pisses me off so much) Paul Aparycki p.s. a few years ago I started a project in southern Argentina . . . a few months traipsing about the countryside. I haven't had time to finish it yet, but plan on going back this year or next and spend 3-6 months completeing it . . . ALL on film, ALL at my expense. Your wannabee stories from the "photo press" are based on fact, but are really "harlequin romances" for the uninspired . . . it sells, and they know it. >That is complete nonsense, photographers that shoot film and are supported >by companies with deep pockets will shoot huge amounts of film. There is a >photographer that traveled with the naturalist that spent two years walking >across central Africa. He is publishing a book of his photographs (with I >believe 106 images). Over the two years he shot 25,000 images. He was >supported by National Geographic. If you don't like Digital that's up to >you, but enough is enough. Calling Digital a plague (I think that's what you >meant, not "plaque") a thousand times worse than cancer or aids is way over >the top. >Gary Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
Re: [Digital BW] A bit OT....MF to b/w print
2005-08-27 by Paul Aparycki
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.