Hi Dave, > From my understanding after reading the weave document, it certainly looks > as if the heads need to > make multiple passes to achieve 1440 and 2880. Thanks for the info. When writing my 3000 alignment utility, I conversed quite a bit with one of the authors of GimpPrint, Robert Krawitz. He was quite helpful. He also speculates, from what I read in the file you mentioned, that the reason for the multiple passes is drying time...and also says as I read in the Epson printer command language document: "The manual actually makes it fairly clear how to do this [1440] (it requires two passes with horizontal head movement between passes), and it is presumably possible to do this with MicroWeave." ...that the head is moved slightly between passes to get the offset between the two 720 spaced dots...therefore, the resolution is really 1440. My real objection to the initial statement, was the claim that the 1440 was somehow nothing but marketing garbage, when IMO, it's clearly not just marketing garbage, that the printer (Epson 3000) does in fact allow 1440 horizontally. Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Inks, Epson vs. Cone etc. was:(more newbie q's)
2001-12-17 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.