Being a "commercial shooter" does not mean anything when it comes to being creative. It certainly does not make one an 'expert' at photography any more than some of the 'look at my family pics' photographers. And, in general, the family pics have a lot more validity for a lot longer time than 99.999999% of the commercial work. And, it's ok if you don't like family pics. Tom Baker Paul Aparycki <tawow@...> wrote: I am sorry if you are offended, but I stand by remark about the incredible level of what can only be described as "HEY, come and look at my family vacation pics!!!". I used to troll about a lot looking for galleries and pages of photographers. I AM interested in seeing others work and most importantly , trying to get a handle on others viewpoint or perception. I don't anymore. Virtually all web sites or galleries devoted to what can laughingly be called "art" or "photography" are as I have described . . . more of an ego stroking for the individual as opposed to worthwhile imagery. I knew when I rsponded, perhaps a little heavy-handed, that I would end up being burnt at the stake, but bear with me for a few minutes . . . and I really hope I don't have to keep repeating this in other posts. THIS IS GONNA BE A LITTLE ON THE LONG SIDE (yes Gary, I know "gonna" is not a word), ;-)) I sense that on this list, and actually it doesn't really matter whether it is this list or the banana importers from antarctica's list, that there are many who are hobbyists, many who are geekheads (a large majority perhaps), and some who are serious photographer/printmakers, and a very, very few who are commercial shooters (I am in that group). Where I jumped, perhaps too soon, was at the implication of "overshoot". Let us go to a fabulously intelligent and very well informed lady by the name of Henrietta Brackman . . . who?? I doubt any of you know her name. She is an artist's portfolio consultant (yeah, I know, it sounds like a load of crap), and she has worked with and modified the "books" of some of the most famous names in commercial photography over the years. "What does that mean to me? I am on a printers list, I am an artist!!!!", well, the constraints, the guidelines that most art directors use are quite similar to those that most publisher/editors use which are the same as those that most gallery owners/curators use . . . so we are all in the same boat (sort of). Anyhow (yes Gary, I know that is not in the dictionary either), her commentary about a portfolio goes something to the effect of, 12-15 images, at the very most perhaps 20. If you have others put them aside and save them for later. She, and most of the agents she has worked with ALL agree on one thing . . . photographers (that is YOU AND ME) are really, really, really, shitty editors . . . and she is absolutely one hundred millionteen (your call again Gary) percent right. Ms Brackman maintains, and correctly, that virtually all photographers have too much emotional baggage tied to their images. Those statements are probably the single most important lessons I have ever learned in image making. Learn to cull . . . without mercy. When you show your work, as MS Brackman states, show a small to medium sampling . . . save some for later and then you do an update . . . the audience is HUNGERING for more. Pull 5 maybe 6 from the original lot, replace them with others, and perhaps add a couple more . . . a DYNAMIC and moving presentation that makes people want to see your work again and again . . . BUT, what do most of you do? Well, my mommy or my brother, or my wife/husband said I take great pictures so here is the picture they liked, Oh, and by the way, here are 3,842 more (SEE THE SLIDES OF MY FAMILY VACATION!!!!!!!!! . . . . PUKE,PUKE,PUKE). I have looked at so many of the "galleries" that some on this list, and others, have posted. I can see exactly what Ms Brackman is talking about when she refers to baggage. So many who have gone to for instance, the Grand Canyon . . . and shot it to death. Yes it is an extraordinary place to be, but the so-so shooter CAN'T bring that out in their photo. There is indeed a competent,well exposed well composed photo, but little emotion . . . the emotion exists solely in the eyes of the photographer (if you can call him/her that), who when they look at the image have "a moving experience" . . . something which DOES NOT exist in their photo, but in their eyes they still remember that moment. Good for them, but the photo is at the same level as the 25 cent postcard, cute, but no cigar . . . THAT is the problem with digital and it's overshoot mentality. Pleeeeeeze (Gary, help me here), learn to be a good photgrapher before you buy a nintedo camera! Paul Aprycki Oh,and by the way Tony, you obviously don't pay any attention when it goes your way, but there has been, in particular the debacle over John Sexton, a mastubatory exhaltation over the merits of more, more, more, more pixels, memory etc I would suggest you learn to be honest >ho are the lazy slugs, Paul ... And what do the references to masturbating, >lugs & cripples imply about your own world view, which I note is not shared >y others who on this list at least show somewhat more respect for others by >ot seeking to be so confrontational & insulting in their attitudes to >thers. None of these comments have a place here and I for one don't intend >o allow you to drag this forum down. >f you have an opinion that's fine, if it involves insulting and degrading >emarks that don't assist or have relevance to the content of the thread >hen who of us cares to listen, not many I think. >ony Kelly Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] A bit OT....MF to b/w print
2005-08-27 by Tom Baker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.