Are there any workshops to help get a grip on the mechanics of shooting with a LF camera? Scott ccolbertbw wrote: > Diane, > I shoot most of my BW (which by anyone's standards is woefully little), > using a 4x5 field camera. I also have a 20D, which I use for all > sorts of photography. No doubt the 4x5 wins - big surprise. It is easy > to scan on a desktop scanner (an EPSON 3200), whereas 35 mm does > not scan very sharply at all. I like the tons of small detail that > comes from > the large format. One thing I don't see mentioned much, is that the > printers can really print with a lot of resolution. You can see the > difference > in the print from large files with lots of data, even in a relatively > small print. Not to say that the smaller formats - digital or film - > can't make a nice large image. It is more a question of visible > detail. And > the ease in which you can transfer it to paper. > > A great way to see whether a larger format will make any difference > to your final product is to try printing some big files. There are a large > number of scans in the library of congress. For > example, some of my favorites are Lewis Hines' images of children > working in mills. Or the Wright brother's plane. You can download scans > of their glass plates - 5x7 usually. I have used these for test prints > sometimes when trying to tweak the printer. Download a couple of > these and print them to see if they look any different than your > current equipment. These ancient images look just wonderful and > I think show off what a print from a big piece of film looks like. > There are also test images from big Dslrs (say on dpreview) that you can > download and compare. Never know which one you will like best. > > A view camera does take a lot more work than a hand held SLR, > whether digital or not. Once you start putting the camera on a tripod, > and with practice, the difference is somewhat less. After getting used > to the view camera, and this is a big point, you feel like you have much > less control of the camera when you don't have movements. Sure, the > bigger format needs the movements to get acceptable depth of field, > but all in all there are just more choices than deciding what's in the > frame. That's fun and useful to some people, not so to others. > > Hope that adds something to the thread. > > Costa > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Diane Fields" > <picnic@c...> > wrote: > > Ken, I am, indirectly, asking about this also. I understand that > there is bias on all sides, > but I also would like input from all sides. I can remain 'all digital' > or I can veer off and > incorporate film/MF also---but realize that I will have to incorporate > a whole new support > system for a different format--and that's not inexpensive. I'm quite > good at PS---and > have done b/w conversions for a number of years, so that's not the > issue. The real issue > is---will I find that I will end up with a 'better' image than I can > with digital. Today, the > assumption by the salesperson was that I'm not 'contemplative' about > my photography-- > with the reality that that is part of most people's approach to > digital--lots of shots on a > card, etc. However---I AM slow, contemplative, etc.--its part of my > creative nature (if you > spent over 20 years as a textile artist/craftsperson with the many > MANY layers of > 'process'---you learn how to plan and never ever have quick > gratification). So--I'm trying > to determine where I want to go with this--and I am most interested in > the b/w print. > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from > the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the > Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd > AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE > LOSSES (EVEN IF THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), > RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF > YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD > PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > * Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint>" on > the web. > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >
Message
LF Workshops? was - Re: [Digital BW] A bit OT....MF to b/w print
2005-08-27 by Scott McLoughlin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.