My own printing, my reading impressions (re archival/clogging issues) and the recent black only print exchange have gotten me here: 1) Black Only works wonderfully with selected images. QTR is much better with most if one prints above 6X9 and does not want a grainy-35 look. It's nice to have the option because that "grany-35-look" can be a positive (referring here to scans, where we have the advantage of an original negative to explore, rather than to digital camera files where the tendency seems to be to emulate film. 2)There's no visual advantage to Epson pigment over Eboni except for personal preference, warm/cool. They differ substantially in ease of availability, reliability/clogging (obvious from this Forum). Archival difference is arguable, MIS seems to be in continual change while Epson seems to be stable. 3) Eboni on Epson Premium Semi matte is unattractive with Eboni due to bronzing....would be adequate for PR photos. Both Epson and Eboni rival silver prints in matte, are far short of what's readily accomplished with silver prints on semi-matte/semi-gloss. Disagree? I'm asking because I'm pondering a dedicated B&W printer... currently use a 2200 with Epson pigments, print 50% color. I might want a 2200/4000...might consider another type. John Kelly/Albuquerque
Message
conclusions and prescription for B&W ?
2005-09-04 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.