File profile/gamma would affect things, yes. But not the gamma the _display_ was set at when profiled. > From: wwodets <odets@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:21:44 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Screen Gamma, was [Digital BW] Re: Problems printing with R2400 > > Steve- > > I believe that with color management turned off in PS (and no ICC > Soft Proof profile) screen gamma may affect correspondence between > screen and print. The ABW driver has no way of knowing what you are > viewing the file "at" in PS because PS is not providing information > to the ABW driver without CM turned on (one way or the other). If > the file itself has an embedded profile of 2.2 (which is what I > think the ABW driver is expecting for "darker") then this might not > make a difference and PS would also make it look "right" on the > screen. If on the other hand the file had an embedded profile of, > let's say, Gray Gamma 1.8 or Dot Gain 20%, PS would make that file > look right on the screen, but the ABW would have no idea. > > Incidentally, I am finding the use of the QTR Create ICC profiles in > Soft Proof quite useful in predicting the print. > > Walt > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale > <stevekale@b...> wrote: >> The gamma at which you calibrated your screen is irrelevant as PS's > colour >> management colour manages the file-to-display rendition. >> >> (Also unless by chance your display's black point equals that of the >> ink/paper combination you are using then it is simply not possible > that they >> match well without using a proof that profiles the printer > greyscale.)
Message
Re: Screen Gamma, was [Digital BW] Re: Problems printing with R2400
2005-09-15 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.