> From: Steve Kale > > I understood good practice to be at least always use a clean factor of the > print resolution ie 2880/4=720, 2880/5=576, 2880/6=480, 2880/8=360, > 2880/9=320, 2880/10=288. The 300 simply came about as a result of the old > 2x150lpi (as Bob Frost noted in an earlier post). The stock Epson driver resamples everything to 720ppi for the desktop models, 360ppi for the wide format models, and then dithers to the higher dpi value. If you want complete control over the resampling, and don't want to trust the Epson driver not to introduce aliasing, use an integral subdivision of those numbers. The old drivers used "nearest neighbor" for resampling, which was asking for trouble. However, the most recent drivers include an edge smoothing option, to eliminate aliasing when it upsamples. I haven't tested it to see how it compares to other manual resampling techniques. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:pderocco@...
Message
RE: [Digital BW] 300ppi vs 360ppi
2005-09-17 by Paul D. DeRocco
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.