Steve, It sounds like you are asking "is this D/A good enough". You know the drill.. In the states, there are do it yourself frame shops that let you make frames with sub-standard tools, i.e. hammer and entry-level corner vise. If you have access to the same, it might be worth trying one out to see if you are satisfied. I use a Logan, and get good results with slow methodical practice and fresh blades. If I try to hurry it, there is a tendency to get cuts that are not perfectly straight. I don't use 8-ply so I don't know if that would be any different other than just harder on the arms. Best regards, John Moody -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Steve Kale Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 4:41 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Framing - Any views on FrameCo products? If I could get 15 prints archival framed for $525 I doubt I would be looking into this. In the UK that would cost me at least $3,200 !! Even if I order from Frame Destination in the US it would cost around $2,000. It seems most moulding suppliers offer a chop service which probably sounds like it's worth paying for - no saws and perfect mitres. I am not up for a C&H mat cutter - amortising $1,200 (assuming I pay US prices) would take a while. I am wondering if the Logan or Frameco cutter is for all practical purposes just as good albeit not necessarily as "built to last". (Not even many frame shops use a computerised cutter.) I would want to cut 8 ply mats comfortably. As for the joining equipment this seems fairly straight forward. I don't need a pneumatic machine as I am comfortable my volumes aren't going to exhaust my arm and it seems even the Logan/FrameCo options will comfortably drive into even hard woods. Steve [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Framing - Any views on FrameCo products?
2005-09-20 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.