Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

[Digital BW] Re: highest quality/permanence

2005-10-01 by Joel Belmont

I don't mind spending long hours in the darkroom; I am perhaps more interested in 
printing digitally for repeatability (so I don't have to retouch the same 20x24 print every 
time I print it) and theoretically to cut down my amount of time spent printing, so I can 
focus more on exposing images.

Regards,
~Joel

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Moody" <moodymz3@y...> 
wrote:
> Joel,
> In addition to cost effectiveness, you need to know if you _like_ printing.
> If you enjoyed the technical aspects of the darkroom then you may do well
> setting up, running and maintaining a printer and software collection.  If
> you don't enjoy it, the cost savings will not matter in the long run.  BTW,
> I don't print for others, that price is what I pay for prints larger than my
> printer allows.
> 
> Best regards,
> John Moody
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Joel
> Belmont
> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 2:07 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: highest quality/permanence
> 
> What I need to do is determine the cost effectiveness of printing myself, or
> having
> someone else do it.
> 
> If I had someone else do it, I would be an ongoing thing with a considerable
> amount of
> prints.  I have no way yet to determine a basis to guage your quote of
> 20/sq. ft., but off
> the top of my head it sound a little high, though I am sure your services
> are worth what
> you charge.
> 
> Regards,
> ~Joel Belmont
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.