Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458

2005-10-07 by Carl Schofield

John,

Yes, I wouldn't want to substitute another black to use with the  
neutral k7 inks, but I could use another black (museum, eboni, or  
portfolio) with the carbon sepia inks.  I'm not sure yet what I'm  
going to do with the PK slot (currently holds a cleaning cart).  MIS  
PKN for printing BO on epson premium semi-matte (I like this for some  
images) is another option I'm considering.

Carl

On Oct 7, 2005, at 10:26 AM, john dean wrote:

> I've been thinking over these same issues. Carl I have always liked
> the damx of Carbon Sepia with the museum black from a good scan. Would
> you say there is a noticeable difference between the earlier inksets
> and K7 in the black content? Shouldn't a good linearization take care
> of that. Your set up sounds ideal and makes we wonder if I should have
> a 7600 just to do what you are doing with the warm and neutral.
>
> Also from past experience, I belive the max black position contributes
>  to the final color tone of the entire set doesn't it? If you put
> Ebony in there aren't you going to destroy the neutrality this set
> represents in the first place and push it toward cooler tones?
>
> What I would like to do is put Ebony in with the Lyson Cave Paint
> color pig inkset in my 10K next week when I set that up. Lyson has
> offered to create a matte black for some of us who insist upon it in
> order to use that set but it isn't a known quantity like Ebony is. Any
> of these combinations have to be linearized to work right.
>
> John
>
>
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield
> <scho@m...> wrote:
>
>>
>> The k7 black does not have an outstanding dmax, but I don't find that
>> it detracts from image quality.  Some values I've measured with the
>> 4000 are:   Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Bright White 1.63, Hahnemuhle White
>> Velvet 1.61, and Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 1.63.  No reason you can't use
>> Portfolio K or any other black ink.  Currently, I'm using the k7
>> black as a "shared" black ink for the neutral and carbon sepia quads
>> in my 4000.  However, I have an unused slot (PK) that I could (and
>> probably will) use for a second black ink.
>>
>> Carl
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2005, at 6:37 AM, Ben Ong wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Re: Piezography Neutral K7 printing
>>>
>>> Hello Carl,
>>>
>>> thanks for the response. So you are using the K7's Black in your
>>> set up; are
>>> you happy with the Dmax you are achieving? I'm getting the claimed
>>> 1.62 Dmax
>>> by Cone with K7 on Photorag, but also achieve 1.7 to 1.74 on
>>> Photorag with
>>> Piezotone Selenium + Portfolio Black + StudioPrint 11. There is a  
>>> very
>>> noticeable difference to the eye in these two measurements to me,
>>> but seems
>>> like people are generally happy with the product out there???
>>>
>>> I am being a bit hard on the product I guess. I shoot 35mm so I'm
>>> probably
>>> not the right candidate to notice a significant increase in
>>> smoothness or
>>> subtle tonal range increases.
>>>
>>> Still I think it would have been nice to at least offer a Portfolio
>>> Black
>>> option to those who want it. They did with Piezotones so why not
>>> with NK7???
>>>
>>> Thanks again. Benny.
>>>
>>>
>>>    Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:38:00 -0400
>>>    From: Carl Schofield <scho@m...>
>>> Subject: Re: Digest Number 3456
>>>
>>> I also think that 7 grays are probably not necessary for most
>>> applications and any smoothness gains would be hard to detect on  
>>> fine
>>> art papers.  I'm using 4 of the neutral k7 grays (including the
>>> black) and the carbon sepia inks in a dual quad setup on my 4000,
>>> driven by QTR.  I'm very pleased with the prints from both inksets.
>>>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.