John, Yes, I wouldn't want to substitute another black to use with the neutral k7 inks, but I could use another black (museum, eboni, or portfolio) with the carbon sepia inks. I'm not sure yet what I'm going to do with the PK slot (currently holds a cleaning cart). MIS PKN for printing BO on epson premium semi-matte (I like this for some images) is another option I'm considering. Carl On Oct 7, 2005, at 10:26 AM, john dean wrote: > I've been thinking over these same issues. Carl I have always liked > the damx of Carbon Sepia with the museum black from a good scan. Would > you say there is a noticeable difference between the earlier inksets > and K7 in the black content? Shouldn't a good linearization take care > of that. Your set up sounds ideal and makes we wonder if I should have > a 7600 just to do what you are doing with the warm and neutral. > > Also from past experience, I belive the max black position contributes > to the final color tone of the entire set doesn't it? If you put > Ebony in there aren't you going to destroy the neutrality this set > represents in the first place and push it toward cooler tones? > > What I would like to do is put Ebony in with the Lyson Cave Paint > color pig inkset in my 10K next week when I set that up. Lyson has > offered to create a matte black for some of us who insist upon it in > order to use that set but it isn't a known quantity like Ebony is. Any > of these combinations have to be linearized to work right. > > John > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield > <scho@m...> wrote: > >> >> The k7 black does not have an outstanding dmax, but I don't find that >> it detracts from image quality. Some values I've measured with the >> 4000 are: Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Bright White 1.63, Hahnemuhle White >> Velvet 1.61, and Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 1.63. No reason you can't use >> Portfolio K or any other black ink. Currently, I'm using the k7 >> black as a "shared" black ink for the neutral and carbon sepia quads >> in my 4000. However, I have an unused slot (PK) that I could (and >> probably will) use for a second black ink. >> >> Carl >> >> On Oct 7, 2005, at 6:37 AM, Ben Ong wrote: >> >> >>> Re: Piezography Neutral K7 printing >>> >>> Hello Carl, >>> >>> thanks for the response. So you are using the K7's Black in your >>> set up; are >>> you happy with the Dmax you are achieving? I'm getting the claimed >>> 1.62 Dmax >>> by Cone with K7 on Photorag, but also achieve 1.7 to 1.74 on >>> Photorag with >>> Piezotone Selenium + Portfolio Black + StudioPrint 11. There is a >>> very >>> noticeable difference to the eye in these two measurements to me, >>> but seems >>> like people are generally happy with the product out there??? >>> >>> I am being a bit hard on the product I guess. I shoot 35mm so I'm >>> probably >>> not the right candidate to notice a significant increase in >>> smoothness or >>> subtle tonal range increases. >>> >>> Still I think it would have been nice to at least offer a Portfolio >>> Black >>> option to those who want it. They did with Piezotones so why not >>> with NK7??? >>> >>> Thanks again. Benny. >>> >>> >>> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:38:00 -0400 >>> From: Carl Schofield <scho@m...> >>> Subject: Re: Digest Number 3456 >>> >>> I also think that 7 grays are probably not necessary for most >>> applications and any smoothness gains would be hard to detect on >>> fine >>> art papers. I'm using 4 of the neutral k7 grays (including the >>> black) and the carbon sepia inks in a dual quad setup on my 4000, >>> driven by QTR. I'm very pleased with the prints from both inksets. >>>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3458
2005-10-07 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.