John; you wrote: > I think it's wonderful that 2400 is emulating silver so closely, but I > don't think it's important visually I don't entirely agree, though I understand you're saying inkjet is already a mature and viable medium, let's get on with making good use of it. But the point of emulating silver is to provide us with some of silver's better qualities: better dmax & dynamic range, smooth rich tonal transitions, finer detail, long life-span, etc... so to the extent that the experimentation/emulation works toward improving our image quality, it is visually important. And if we could get all the way there on some of these elegant cotton papers instead of RC, that (at least for me)would be the best of both worlds, but it may be a while yet before pigs on cotton will reach a 2.2+ dmax, and who knows if inkjet will ever match the silky smooth tonal transitions of a large format neg, but we can hope. And in the meantime play to the medium's strong points. BTW, I'm glad to hear inkjets are getting good prices and acceptance out your way, that's good news Steve Karafyllakis . > > John Kelly > Albuquerque >
Message
Re: No more (ok, very little) matte paper for me ... (was - Matte pa
2005-10-08 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.