In other words, the >100 years means "we are approximately as good as Epson, using their inks, we cost more, and need custom profiles to work." I gues for some it's worth getting the Kodak copyright logo on the back, as opposed to the Epson logo, getting out customer to think our prints are actually inkjet (which they think they can do themselves), thereby devaluing the value of our work. Claude In a message dated 10/12/2005 7:52:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com writes: Hello Everyone, Here's a link to Kodak's Image Stability White Paper for those who understand this kind of technical stuff. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Kodak paper on stability
2005-10-12 by claudej1@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.