Digital BW, The Print

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, claudej1@a... wrote:
>Originally, this just started out with a comment on the Kodak Lustre paper, which I said I 
liked. Someone asked about stability and I provided a link to Kodak. 

I know nothing about image testing, and I wasn't trying to carry water for Kodak.

I do like the paper though. Perhaps Wilhelm will test it.

Steve
> In other words, the >100 years means "we are approximately as good as Epson, 
> using their inks, we cost more, and need custom profiles to work." I gues for 
> some it's worth getting the Kodak copyright logo on the back, as opposed to 
> the Epson logo, getting out customer to think our prints are actually inkjet 
> (which they think they can do themselves), thereby devaluing the value of our 
> work.
> 
> Claude
> 
> In a message dated 10/12/2005 7:52:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com writes:
> Hello Everyone,
> 
> Here's a link to Kodak's Image Stability White Paper for those who 
> understand this kind of technical stuff.
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>