> .. talked with reps from Hawk Mtn ... Hahnemuhle and Red River... > > 1. The [paper type] setting is mostly about ink load and the > differences among the matte paper type settings in this regard > is very slight. > 2. The "fine art" papers all require a coating (at least for > pigments) and the differences in the coatings are very slight in > terms of ability to handle ink load. Some of the cheaper matte papers are the ones that will need a lower load. On older printers the Photo Quality Inkjet paper setting was the one to try if the blacks looked mottled or the 95% step was not lighter than the 100% step. > 3. No one ... uses the EEM for anything. Like Diana, I find > the prints on this paper muddy (or dull) and the blacks uneven. That depends on the printer and black ink. I find EEM to be the standard in terms of dmax and image quality on many printers. I'm sure the competitors hate it. > ... > 6. There was a great deal of admiration for Epson's ability to > match printers to their papers and ink (or vice versa) and one rep > said, "We can't do work of that precision." Epson's dithering is > also admired. That's why I like to use the Epson driver. It's a very stable and good piece of software that is very well matched to the specific printer. I think Premier Art is benefiting from being the apparent supplier of UltraSmooth. PremierArt 205 appears to use essentially the same coating as UltraSmooth. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Followup: "Paper type" settings and third party papers . . .
2005-10-14 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.